Documentary – Tony Ward

Travel: Last Days at The Plaza Hotel

Fashion photo of tall dutch model wearing gorgeous full length dress with kinky prop — Anna at The Plaza Hotel. Photo: Tony Ward, Copyright 2004

Last Days at The Plaza Hotel

As We Once Knew It

Anna and I checked in to the Plaza Hotel on the last day it was to be open in 2004 for several years. Its mystique would change forever. I booked one of the iconic rooms to test shoot several dresses designed by a friend in the fashion industry. The style of the clothing was most suitable to the grandeur that exuded history and class.

The Plaza Hotel, perched at the corner of Fifth Avenue and Central Park South in New York City, is one of the most storied landmarks in hospitality. Since its opening in 1907, the Plaza has stood as a symbol of opulence, hosting world leaders, celebrities, and cultural moments that shaped its legacy. But even icons must evolve, and in the early 2000s, the Plaza underwent a significant transformation that changed its history forever.

When the Plaza opened on October 1, 1907, it redefined luxury. Designed in the French Renaissance style by architect Henry Janeway Hardenbergh, the 19-story hotel featured crystal chandeliers, lavish ballrooms, and unparalleled views of Central Park. Its suites catered to royalty, business magnates, and stars of stage and screen, while its Palm Court became synonymous with high society gatherings.

woman seated on bed at Plaza Hotel with underwear showing — Photo: Tony Ward, Copyright 2004

Over the decades, the Plaza became a cultural touchstone, immortalized in literature, film, and television. From its role in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby to its portrayal in Home Alone 2, the hotel remained an enduring symbol of glamour and sophistication.

By the late 20th century, the Plaza faced challenges as newer luxury hotels emerged. Maintenance of the historic building became costly, and ownership changed hands multiple times. In 2004, the Plaza closed its doors for a major redevelopment under its then-owner, El-Ad Properties. The plan was controversial: the iconic hotel would be partially converted into luxury condominiums, with only a portion remaining a hotel.

The decision sparked public outcry, with preservationists and New Yorkers mourning the loss of a beloved institution. Still, the redevelopment moved forward, balancing modern demands with the building’s historic charm.

After a three-year renovation, the Plaza reopened in 2008 with a new identity. Of its 805 original rooms, 282 were transformed into private residences, while 282 remained hotel rooms. The redesign preserved iconic elements, including the Palm Court and the Grand Ballroom, while introducing modern amenities to attract contemporary clientele.

Today, the Plaza Hotel remains a blend of its historic past and modern reinvention. Its transformation in the early 2000s reflects the evolution of New York City itself—a place where tradition and innovation coexist. Though its role has shifted, the Plaza continues to captivate, reminding the world of the enduring allure of Fifth Avenue’s crown jewel.

When I checked out of the hotel the next day a bellman came up to my room with a tearful eyes. I asked him what was wrong. He said, “Ive worked at this place for the last 50 years. It will never be the same.”

beautiful Dutch woman lying on bed at the Plaza Hotel NY — Photo: Tony Ward, Copyright 2004

Venice, California: The Iconic Binoculars Building on Main Street

The Binoculars Building

Back in the early 1990’s I was working regularly with Art Directors that were employed by Advertising Agencies. The bigger the agency the larger the potential project for a freelance photographer. Chiat Day was one of those agencies that had cachet and every photographer in the world wanted to work with them. I had the good fortune of being summoned to the New York division of Chiat Day to be offered a peachy national ad campaign in the early 1990’s and very quickly got to know the location of the LA office.

The building at 340 Main Street in Venice, California, famously adorned with a massive sculpture of binoculars at its entrance, is an architectural and cultural landmark. Known as the “Binoculars Building,” it was designed by the legendary architect Frank Gehry in collaboration with Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen, who created the distinctive binoculars sculpture. Completed in 1991, this striking structure is a testament to Gehry’s imaginative and unconventional approach to architecture.

Initially commissioned by advertising agency Chiat/Day as their headquarters, the Binoculars Building was intended to symbolize the company’s creative spirit and forward-thinking philosophy. The binoculars, which double as a functional entrance to the building, immediately capture attention, blending art with architecture in a way that feels distinctly Californian.

The building itself is a blend of Gehry’s signature deconstructivist style and practical office space design. It consists of three main sections: the binoculars in the center, flanked by two asymmetrical structures with undulating forms and sharp angles. These elements create a dynamic composition that reflects Venice’s eclectic and artistic vibe.

Over the years, the building has transitioned to serve new tenants. In 2011, Google leased the space as part of its Southern California campus, further solidifying the site’s association with innovation and creativity. Today, it stands as a hub for tech and creative professionals, while continuing to attract admirers of its architectural and artistic significance.

The binoculars sculpture itself is more than a decorative feature; it houses a conference room and other interior spaces, showcasing the functional integration of art and architecture. This fusion makes the building an enduring symbol of Venice’s cultural identity, where art, innovation, and community intersect.

As one of Frank Gehry’s most playful works, the Binoculars Building remains a must-see destination in Venice, drawing visitors from around the world who are eager to experience its unique blend of creativity and functionality.

Recently during a trip to LA it just so happened that I stayed in an Airbnb just down the street from Chiat Day’s former office. I was riding along on a bicycle scouting backdrops for a shoot when I came across memory lane. I must have been in and out of that building multiple times during that time period. It was great to see that old memory come alive!

Behind The Scenes: Heroines & Vixens

Behind The Scenes: Heroines & Vixens

Here is a look back at some of the behind the scenes moments of the subjects and the team that it took to produce the dramatic portraits for the Heroines & Vixens series. My apologies to any of the women that was photographed for the series but are not represented in the mosaic of these captured moments. I didn’t have the forethought when the series first began to have the sittings documented during production.

It wasn’t until creative director, KVaughn and I realized there was a thirst on social media for followers to gain insight as to the team work required to produce these portraits. As of this writing 22 women have been photographed from a variety of backgrounds and ages ranging from 21 to 75. Each woman cast writes an introductory story about themselves which is requirement to participate in the series. Some of the stories have been tragic others have been celebratory but all so very interesting.

I would like to thank the subjects that have sat for the project thus far. They are; Katie Kerl, Brittany Goldberg, Diana Desiderio, Ade Jay, Milan Burnett, Rita Olivia, Slater, Lisa Hughes, Joy Arnold, Megan Golwitzer, Amanda Stevenson, Shannell Verandez, Kathryn O’Connor, Erica Smitheman, Kitty Hailey, Ellen Tiberino, Shawna Williams, Mikala Mikrut, Savanna Hang, Tara Mordin, Scorpiana and Tracey Olkus.

Special thanks to creative director KVaughn, lighting assistant Anthony Colagreco and photographers: Brian Hunt, Steve Feldman and Al B for producing the photographs for this article.

To learn more about the series, link to gallery: https://tonyward.com/the-heroines-vixens-series/

KVaughn: Fall Scarves Collection 2024 at Trunc Boutique Philly

KVaughn Fall 2024 at Trunc Boutique, Philly. — KVaughn Fall Collection 2024 at Trunc Boutique, Philly. Photography by Brian Hunt Copyright 2024

Trunc Boutique

929 N. Second Street

Philadelphia

MEET THE ARTIST

First Friday Opening Night

Date: October 4, 2024

Time: 6pm-8pm

To learn more about Trunc Boutique Philly link here: https://www.trunc.net

Politics: Who is Leonard Leo?

Portrait of Leonard Leo for article on right wing Lunatics — Who is Leonard Leo?

Politics: Who is Leonard Leo?

Leonard Leo: The Power Broker Behind America’s Judicial Shift

In the landscape of American politics, few individuals wield as much behind-the-scenes influence as Leonard Leo. As the former executive vice president of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization, Leo has played a pivotal role in reshaping the judiciary to reflect a more conservative philosophy. This has raised concerns about the long-term implications of his influence on the state of democracy in the USA.

The Architect of Conservative Judicial Dominance

Leonard Leo’s career is a testament to the power of strategic legal maneuvering. He has been instrumental in the nomination and confirmation of several Supreme Court justices, including John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. These appointments have shifted the Supreme Court to a solid conservative majority, potentially affecting rulings on key issues for decades.

Leo’s influence extends beyond the Supreme Court. He has been involved in placing conservative judges in lower federal courts, thereby shaping the judiciary at multiple levels. This systematic approach ensures that conservative legal principles influence a broad spectrum of legal decisions, from district courts to the highest court in the land.

Political Beliefs and Judicial Philosophy

Leonard Leo’s political beliefs are grounded in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, often referred to as originalism. This philosophy argues that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the original understanding of its text at the time it was written. While this approach has its merits, critics argue that it can lead to regressive rulings that do not consider the evolving context of modern society.

Leo’s influence has been particularly pronounced in cases involving reproductive rights, affirmative action, voting rights, and environmental regulations. The conservative majority he helped build has made significant rulings, such as the rollback of Roe v. Wade, which underscores the profound impact of his judicial strategy.

The Dangers to Democracy

The consolidation of judicial power in the hands of a particular ideology poses significant dangers to the state of democracy. A judiciary that consistently rules in favor of conservative principles can undermine progressive legislation, even when it reflects the will of the majority. This can lead to a disconnect between public opinion and judicial outcomes, eroding trust in democratic institutions.

One of the most concerning aspects of Leo’s influence is the potential for entrenching minority rule. The conservative legal philosophy often supports decisions that favor the interests of the powerful over those of marginalized groups. This can exacerbate existing inequalities and hinder efforts to achieve social justice.

Moreover, the emphasis on originalism can hinder the judiciary’s ability to adapt to contemporary challenges. Issues like climate change, digital privacy, and evolving social norms require a judiciary capable of interpreting the Constitution in a manner that addresses present-day realities. A rigid adherence to originalism can stifle this necessary evolution, leaving the judiciary ill-equipped to protect the rights and interests of future generations.

The Path Forward

Addressing the challenges posed by Leonard Leo’s influence requires a multifaceted approach. First, there is a need for greater transparency in the judicial nomination process. The involvement of secretive organizations and dark money in shaping the judiciary undermines public trust and accountability.

Second, there must be a concerted effort to balance the ideological composition of the courts. This includes advocating for judicial nominees who represent a broader spectrum of legal philosophies and ensuring that the judiciary reflects the diversity of the American populace.

Finally, it is crucial to engage in robust civic education to foster a deeper understanding of the judiciary’s role in democracy. An informed public is better equipped to hold leaders accountable and advocate for a judiciary that upholds democratic principles.

Conclusion

Leonard Leo’s legacy is a testament to the profound impact one individual can have on the judicial landscape. While his influence has solidified a conservative stronghold in the judiciary, it also highlights the fragility of democratic institutions. Ensuring a judiciary that reflects the evolving values of society and maintains the trust of the public is essential for the health of American democracy. As the nation grapples with these challenges, the lessons of Leonard Leo’s influence serve as both a cautionary tale and a call to action.