Politics Archives - Tony Ward

David Biddle: Which Way We Going Now?

The Orange Menace Trump artwork by Thomcat23 — The Orange Menace. Artwork by Thomcat23

Which Way We Going Now?

Being an Artist in This Strange New World

I’ve been wondering about two things ever since the spring of 2016 when Donald Trump began winning primaries and getting all sorts of weird media attention. First off, were the Republican Party and its voters really willing to accept responsibility for the direction that guy wanted to push them? And, secondly, how much would the art world step up as a reaction to what Trump and his ilk seemed to want to do to our country?

Obviously, that first question has been answered. But the second one is still up in the air. How exactly are creative people going to respond using their talents, especially now, halfway into the third decade of this century?

During Trump’s first term, the only real potent work going out to the edge of our culture seemed to me that from the world of comedians and comic wannabes. Lots of late-night TV joking, social media memes, and talking head cable news folks getting goofy. Many of us kept laughing as best we could, waiting until normal life could start up again, especially once Covid-19 made things so difficult.

It’s clear now, with this second term, that we’re in a different moment historically. Attempting to obliterate major American institutions and remake our national economy in order to create ever more tax cuts for the wealthy is not something to joke about. To those of us who have worked with and in government agencies professionally (I had many roles as an analyst, planner, and administrator for nearly 30 years) the idea that public servants would be reviled as members of a so-called “deep state” (a fictional propaganda concept), is extremely sad, frustrating, and maddening. There’s little question, too, that we are only at the beginning of a four-year debacle of incompetence and unnecessary cruelty.

So, I wonder how painters, songwriters, photographers, designers, writers, choreographers, sculptors, filmmakers and other committed, professional artists see what’s going on. We are watching a level of hostile disregard for virtually everything that made our country an endlessly enthralling place to live and create for at least the last 160 years. Glimmers of imaginative rebellion and poetic opposition have begun to pop up, but when is it going to become a tidal wave or a movement? For that matter, when are audiences and fans going to stop wanting to bear witness to cute kitchen dancing and funny pet tricks in favor of honest questions about dishonest propaganda and dishonoring what it means to be a member of our diverse and complicated society?

All of this is deeply frustrating on so many levels. Where does one start? I don’t see politics in my work. I see common sense and concern for the lives of my fellow citizens. I believe in peace, love, community, independence, laughing, looking people in the eyes, being honest, and working hard not to be angry or hateful towards others, trying to understand not judge. That’s all seeping into my stories these days—from novels to flash fiction. I can only assume a similar approach will be true of other artists over the next few years.

We keep hearing the media talk about “bubbles” and “silos” and “different realities.” Artists have always known about those things. The arts can be an antidote to politics by waking up honest and meaningful emotion on deep levels for each single one of us 340 million people. Even if the only thing we accomplish is to remind people that we’re all in this together, we’ll have made a big contribution to a better future for our grandchildren and their children.

artwork by Tomcat 23 entitled wag the potus — Wag The Potus. Artwork by Thomcat23, Copyright 2025

David Biddle is a Philadelphia-based writer whose new novel, Sound Effect Infinity, is available at all the obvious places online. He can be reached through his website: https://davidbiddle.net

For additional articles by David Biddle, link here: https://tonyward.com/david-biddle-sound-effect-infinity/

Bob Shell: You’ve Been Lied To

A.I. rendering of large drones hovering over the nations capitol — Simulation by A.I. ImageFx

You’ve Been Lied To

In the new administration’s first press conference on January 28, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the ‘drone mystery’ had been solved. The mystery drones seen in New Jersey and other parts of the USA were all research drones operated by the FAA, the Federal Aviation Administration.

That is simply nonsense! Some of the ‘drones’ were the size of SUVs, at least one was the size of a schoolbus, and they hovered for hours completely silently, or darted around in seemingly random ways. They moved in prohibited airspace over sensitive government facilities, even caused closure of airports. FAA research drones? I don’t think so.

In addition to being seen in the USA, they were seen in England, Europe, and Australia, and most probably other countries as well. The FAA, even if they had gigantic silent drones, does not operate outside the USA.

I was pleased that Chris Cuomo on NewsNation called out this ridiculous pack of lies. He’s followed the ‘drone’ story from the beginning, and knows just how idiotic this ‘explanation’ is.

Whatever people were seeing, and shooting video of, they weren’t drones. They were UFOs. Quite simply, they were unidentified, they were flying, and we must assume they were objects, not hallucinations. Hallucinations don’t show up on video.

I had hopes that the Trump administration would treat the American public as adults, not children. We’ve been lied to about UFOs since at least the coverup of the Roswell event in 1947. We’ve been told we were seeing weather balloons, stars, planets, the moon, swamp gas, swarms of fireflies, etc., etc., and now FAA research drones.

Professional pilots have been insulted by being told that they did not see what they knew they did see. Astronomers have been similarly insulted.

I can only hope that President Trump is unaware that he’s being lied to and hasn’t signed on to this conspiracy of mistruth. The American people deserve to be treated as adults, they deserve the truth.

Back in 1997, when I was heavily involved in UFO research and writing, I had a long telephone conversation with the Air Force Colonel who wrote the Pentagon’s book, ‘Roswell: Case Closed.’ He told me that this book was simply propaganda, that he’d seen films of the autopsies of alien bodies. When I mentioned this conversation on an online UFO forum, he denied ever speaking to me.

But he forgot that he’d mentioned our conversation to Phil Klass. Phil was the most vocal UFO skeptic, and published a skeptical UFO newsletter. In spite of our disagreements on the subject, Phil and I were friends. And he was an honest man. He called out the lie that the conversation I mentioned never happened. Nothing more was heard from the Air Force on the subject.

I personally interviewed most of the living Roswell witnesses in the mid-1990s, and came away convinced that they were almost all telling the truth about what they saw in the summer of 1947. Some of the people I interviewed have never gone public with their stories. They were not publicity seekers.

People have been seeing things of nonhuman origin for thousands of years, what government whistleblowers call things of NHI, Non Human Intelligence. In an exclusive, NewsNation recently broadcast video of the recovery of an NHI egg-shaped craft by the US government. These things are real, we know very little about them, and they move through our skies with impunity.

Mr. Trump, the time has come to stop the lies.

About The Author: Bob Shell is a professional photographer, author, former editor in chief of Shutterbug Magazine and veteran contributor to this blog. He is currently serving a 35 year sentence for involuntary manslaughter for the death of Marion Franklin, one of his former models. He is serving the 17th year of his sentence at Pocahontas State Correctional Facility, Virginia.

On September 16, 2024 Shell’s release date got moved up six years due to new “mixed charges” law to February 2, 2030. It was 2036.

To read additional articles by Bob Shell link here: https://tonyward.com/bob-shell-ufo-stupidity/

2024: Covers of The Year

2024: Covers of The Year

The Selection Process

In the world of print and digital media, a magazine cover is more than just an introduction; it’s a bold statement. A cover serves as the magazine’s handshake to potential readers, a visual ambassador that communicates the essence of the issue. Choosing the right image is a critical decision that can determine whether a magazine gets picked up or passed over. This is true for online webzines like TW as well.

A magazine cover has less than five seconds to grab a reader’s attention. On social media or even the internet even less. In that fleeting moment, the image must convey a story, evoke emotion, and spark curiosity. It sets the tone for the content within and defines the publication’s identity. Whether it’s a striking portrait, an artistic still life, or a dynamic action shot, the image must resonate deeply with the target audience.

Equally important is the alignment of the image with the magazine’s theme. For example, a travel magazine may choose an expansive landscape to inspire wanderlust, while a fashion publication might highlight a model wearing bold, trend-setting attire to reflect the latest styles. The image must seamlessly integrate with the coverlines, typography, and overall design that’s been evolving over the years creating a cohesive visual narrative.

Beyond aesthetics, the image must also provoke an emotional response. I have discovered over the past 10 years of publishing homepage covers, they often feature elements of surprise, intimacy, or drama—elements that compel readers to take a closer look. A captivating gaze, a powerful moment frozen in time, something erotic or controversial can intrigue our viewership and encourage them to explore further.

Practical considerations also play a role. The image should be high-quality, with a resolution and composition that accommodate text overlays without losing impact. It must stand out on crowded google searches and in digital previews, where competition for attention is fierce.

Finally, cultural relevance and sensitivity are paramount. A cover image should reflect the sites left leaning societal values and avoid misrepresentation or controversy that alienates readers. Striking the right balance between boldness and respect ensures a positive and lasting impression.

Choosing the perfect magazine cover image is both an art and a science that I’ve practiced diligently over the years. When executed thoughtfully, it becomes a gateway to the stories within—a visual promise of inspiration, insight, and discovery. In the end, the right image doesn’t just catch the eye; it captures your memories and inspires you.

Trump: A Threat to Lady Liberty

Young beautiful woman dressed as lady liberty on Haloween — Lady Liberty. Photo: Tony Ward, Copyright 2024

Trump: A Threat to Lady Liberty

Lady Liberty has long been a symbol of what America aspires to be. The statue was a gift from France to celebrate democracy, representing the mutual commitment of both nations to liberty and freedom. Her torch signifies enlightenment, while her crown, with seven rays, represents the seven continents, signaling an invitation to people worldwide. At her feet, a broken shackle symbolizes the breaking free from oppression and tyranny, a core principle of American ideals.

The statue has inspired Americans and immigrants alike, serving as a testament to a land built by people from all walks of life. The words inscribed on her pedestal, taken from Emma Lazarus’s poem The New Colossus, famously declare, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” Her message has been one of compassion, inclusivity, and unity—a reminder of the strength that diversity brings.

As the nation approaches the upcoming election, Trump continues to spew lies, physical threats and hate speech while Lady Liberty’s ideals feel shaken. Increasing political polarization has created deep divisions on key issues like immigration, racial justice, and freedom of the press. The rise of nationalist rhetoric has challenged America’s longstanding commitment to diversity and openness, casting doubt on the country’s willingness to be a haven for those “yearning to breathe free.” Policies that restrict immigration, rhetoric that fosters division, and attacks on democratic institutions strike at the very foundation of the values she represents.

At the same time, disinformation and attacks on the integrity of elections make Lady Liberty’s torch seem dimmer. The trust in democratic processes is essential to her symbolism as a guide to freedom and justice. When voting rights are restricted or when public trust in elections is eroded, the country moves further from the democratic ideals she was built to uphold.

In this crucial moment, Lady Liberty’s symbolism serves as a call to action for Americans. Protecting her ideals means renewing commitments to fairness, inclusivity, and democracy itself. This election offers an opportunity for Americans to stand for a vision that honors diversity, reinforces freedom of expression, and reestablishes respect for human rights. It’s a chance to ensure her torch continues to shine for future generations.

Lady Liberty reminds us that freedom requires vigilance and courage. To honor her, Americans must resist apathy and remain engaged, whether through voting, standing against injustice, or promoting unity over division. She stands as a guidepost not only for a free society but for a compassionate one, welcoming those in need and providing opportunity for all.

As America stands at this crossroads, the Statue of Liberty’s message is as relevant as ever. Will the nation rise to defend the ideals she symbolizes, or will her torch flicker in the face of division and distrust? The answer lies in the hands of every American voter, each with the power to keep the light of liberty alive.

It’s Time to Sell Your Tesla

AI generated image of a Tesla for an article on the political ambitions of Elon Musk — Tesla

It’s Time to Sell Your Tesla

Tesla, the electric vehicle company, was founded in 2003 by engineers Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning, who aimed to build a practical and desirable electric car. They envisioned creating electric vehicles (EVs) that would challenge the fossil fuel-driven automobile industry by offering cleaner, more efficient alternatives. Their focus on high-performance EVs, starting with the Tesla Roadster, laid the foundation for Tesla’s future success.

Elon Musk joined Tesla in 2004, leading a Series A investment round, which gave him significant influence in the company. Although Musk was not a founder or the original inventor of Tesla, he quickly became the face of the company, primarily due to his larger-than-life public persona and financial backing. Musk became the CEO in 2008 after a leadership dispute, and his vision for Tesla’s expansion into mass-market EVs, energy storage, and autonomous driving technologies helped catapult the company into global recognition.

Musk gets much of the credit for Tesla’s invention because of his pivotal role in scaling the company, his visionary leadership, and his ability to attract media attention. His relentless pursuit of innovation and bold public presence have overshadowed Tesla’s early founders, often leading to the misconception that Musk invented the company.

Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur behind Tesla, SpaceX, and X (formerly Twitter), is widely known for his groundbreaking contributions to technology and space exploration. In recent years, however, his growing political involvement has raised concerns about the potential implications for U.S. democracy. Musk’s public endorsements of political figures, controversial commentary, and apparent desire to influence policy have led some to speculate about his deeper political ambitions. While it is natural for any individual to express political opinions, Musk’s influence as a tech magnate poses several risks to the democratic process.

One of the most glaring concerns is Musk’s access to vast financial resources and media influence. With his net worth fluctuating between hundreds of billions, Musk holds immense sway over markets, technology, and now, political discourse. His purchase of X has granted him a direct line to millions of users, amplifying his voice in the public sphere. As the platform’s owner, Musk controls the content that gets promoted, silenced, or even manipulated, potentially skewing political narratives. This raises questions about the role of billionaire-owned media in shaping elections and policy, as well as the dangers of unchecked influence on the digital town square.

Additionally, Musk’s political ideologies appear to shift based on personal interests, leading to fears of opportunism rather than a genuine commitment to any particular cause. While he has presented himself as a free speech advocate, many critics argue that his approach prioritizes personal benefit over democratic principles. Musk has been accused of using his wealth and influence to resist regulatory frameworks, as seen in his clashes with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and environmental agencies. His disregard for rules that apply to others may set a dangerous precedent, encouraging an anti-democratic ethos where the wealthy elite can operate above the law.

Furthermore, Musk’s frequent, often erratic social media outbursts could destabilize public trust in democratic institutions. His ability to sway markets with a single tweet is already well-documented, and this influence could be equally dangerous in the political sphere. Should Musk actively seek political office or further his influence through lobbying and endorsements, there is a risk of undermining the democratic process by concentrating too much power in the hands of one individual.

In sum, while Elon Musk’s entrepreneurial successes are commendable, his growing political influence and ambitions pose real risks to U.S. democracy. By wielding outsized economic power and media control, he could distort the political landscape, threatening the foundational principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability.